Defeat Input Lag this Holiday! Best HDTVs for Gaming in 2015

6

It’s that time of the year again! The holiday season is officially in full gear, starting with Black Friday in mere hours and going all the way through Christmas. This year saw the first real push for 4K HDTVs into our living rooms, offering four times the resolution of Full HD 1080p. However, we all hate input lag in our gaming. Which HDTVs are worth your money this year? Read on to find out!

 

Samsung UN65JU7500

Our top pick for the best gaming display is quite a departure from previous years. This year, Samsung really stepped their game up and introduced much lower input lag, even in their 4K models! The JU7500 is a curved display, which Samsung has widely adopted in the majority of their lineup since last year. The JU7500 features 4 HDMI 2.0 ports, which is crucial for displaying 4K 60hz content. It also supports 4:4:4, which is critical towards PC usage. Simply set the display to PC mode in order to take advantage of this. The JU7500 also supports 3D content, which is great for those that adopted an assortment of 3D media. Local dimming support ensures that black scenes will retain their darkness to obtain high contrast ratio. HDR content is going to be a big deal in the coming years; rest assured that the JU7500 also supports HDR content. Once set to Game Mode, the UN65JU7500 exhibits an ultra-low 17ms of input lag, which is fast enough for any of your gaming needs. What’s remarkable is that this low input lag was tested with a 1080p source, without any major input lag added via panel scaling! Is the 65″ version out of the budget? No worries, as the JU7500 starts at 40″ and goes all the way up to 78″.

 
 

Check out Samsung JU7500 reviews & pricing on Amazon

Sony XBR-75X940C

Sony’s XBR-75X940C is one of the best HDTVs on the market, and for good reason. This high-end offering from Sony introduces its brand new X1 processor, which improves color accuracy, contrast, and clarity of HD and 4K video in the X940C. You can expect top of the line features such as 4:4:4, HDR, 3D, and full 4K 60hz support for all of your media consumption. What sets this set above the majority of HDTVs is full-array local dimming, which does a stunning job at improving your image quality over traditional edge-lit local dimming HDTVs. 1080p sources sent through the X1 processor look excellent on the X940C, and the Triluminous display is a cut above the competition. If you’re not one for external audio, the speakers on the X940C are noticeably better than most stock HDTV offerings, which may be sufficient for your aural needs. Once set to Game Mode, the XBR-75X940C manages a low input lag of 37ms, which is significantly better than the majority of HDTVs on the market. It’s hard to go wrong with Sony’s X940C.

 
 

Check out Sony X940C reviews & pricing on Amazon
 

 
 

Samsung UN40JU6700

Samsung’s UN40JU6700 comes as our value pick for this year, as it supports 4K 60hz resolution at an affordable price. It includes four HDMI ports to connect all of your sources, a quad core processor to boost your Smart TV functionality, as well as Wi-Fi 802.11n support. The best part about this screen is it’s low input lag performance even with 1080p sources, clocking in at 27ms. Try to sit within 5 feet of this screen to really take advantage of the 4K resolution offered on the JU6700. It’s a curved screen, so it’s designed to be a personal viewing experience. As of this writing, you can have the 40″ JU6700 just under $649!

 

Check out Samsung JU6700 reviews & pricing on Amazon
 

 

Samsung UN32J4000

 

Looking for a low cost display to add to your collection? Samsung has consistently made low lag entry level HDTVs for those that want something affordable for their setup. Samsung’s UN32J4000 only offers 720p resolution and two HDMI ports, so you’re going to be limited to only two sources. While I wouldn’t recommend this HDTV for any sort of critical viewing, it does maintain low input lag, which makes it an ideal option for gamers on a tight budget. The input lag of the UN32J4000 is 28ms when tested with a 1080p source, which means you can output 1080p resolution from your PlayStation 4/Xbox One and have the TV downscale the image to 720p. The price is hard to beat too, coming in under $199 as of this writing.

 
 

Check out Samsung J4000 reviews & pricing on Amazon

 
 

Hopefully this guide proved useful towards your gaming purchase. While these are my personal top choices, it’s worth browsing our input lag database, which features over 400 displays tested for input lag. Let us know what you think of the displays mentioned here, or another display you managed to score a deal on this holiday!


Share.

About Author

Adeel Soomro

Adeel Soomro, also known as "Four Wude", has been a competitive Street Fighter 4 player since 2008. Using his extensive gaming experience on a casual and professional level, he aims to spread the awareness of input lag existing in today's displays. Having tested over 300 displays for input lag, he hopes that DisplayLag will aid gamers around the world when purchasing the best HDTV or monitor for gaming.

6 Comments

  1. Are you sure ju7500 has hdr???
    I have this set and it’s amazing but I rang samsung who told me it’s not hdr compatible or never will be….

    However they also told me the js8500 has a240 hz native panel and that it’s input lag is the same as the 7500 lol

  2. I’m looking to check on 1 monitor and 1 tv, they are respectively SAMSUNG S32E590C (monitor) and Samsung UN32J6300 (TV). These choices would be strictly for console gaming and usage. Is there any lag input info on these? Or other useful info?

  3. Benjamin Morgan on

    Any budget 32″ 1080p HDTV for low input lag gaming? under $250 probably. Vizio E and D series is great but unfortunately you cannot find those in South Asia.

    • Adeel Soomro
      Adeel Soomro on

      Unfortunately, I haven’t had any luck tracking down 32″ 1080p displays with low input lag. I know you will go a bit smaller with a monitor, but the picture quality will be much higher. Is this an option?

Leave A Reply